Litigation Support Services

Expert Witness Testimony

Attorney Julie A. Moore is retained as an expert witness across the country in cases involving employment practices.

50+
Cases as Expert
25+
Years Experience
$9M+
Verdicts Supported

The use of expert witness testimony is becoming increasingly the norm in employment litigation. Since 2000, while simultaneously being a boots-on-the-ground consultant, Julie Moore has been retained as an expert witness in over 50 matters, both by employers and employees.

An employment practices expert can offer valuable insight, opinions, and testimony about whether an employer’s policies, procedures, or actions — such as its workplace investigation or handling of discipline or termination — align with or are inconsistent with standard HR practices. Courts recognize that an expert witness may testify if they are qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, and their knowledge will help a judge or jury to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue. Further, the offered opinion must be based upon sufficient facts or data, and it must be the product of reliable principles and methods that were applied to the facts of the case. Testimony must be both reliable and relevant to be admissible.

Juries can benefit from hearing testimony from an experienced Human Resources expert who explains standard practices in the workplace (and not legal conclusions that would usurp a jury’s function). One Federal Court recently issued an Order allowing Julie Moore to testify about the applicable professional standards relating to Human Resources guidelines in conducting workplace investigations or climate assessments, as well as the employer’s performance in light of those standards. The Court found that her testimony is based on her “expertise and may help the jury resolve an issue of material fact.” Julie has numerous other Court Orders finding her testimony admissible and helpful to the factfinder.

Areas of Expertise

Julie offers expert opinions across the full spectrum of employment practices and human resources matters, including:

Sexual and other unlawful harassment
Discrimination
Retaliation
Workplace investigations
Harassment prevention
Policies and training
Performance management
Reductions in force
Employee terminations
Leaves of absence
ADA accommodations
Internal policies and procedures
Hiring, supervision, and retention practices

Testimony Highlights

$7.3million

Peter Redman v. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.A. et al

Cumberland County, Maine · Business and Consumer Court · BCD-CV-09-07 · June 2010

Julie’s testimony regarding industry standards in conducting an internal investigation, including remedial and corrective measures at the conclusion of an investigation, helped a jury reach this record verdict in Peter Redman’s favor.

$277,000

Karen Pepin v. PC Connection and GovConnection

Merrimack County, New Hampshire · Business Court · 217-2010-CV-5010 · June 2010

Julie testified about reasonable practices in terminations and layoffs. The jury concluded the employer discriminated against Karen Pepin on the basis of pregnancy and gender, and retaliated against her for complaining. She was awarded $67,903 in back pay, $160,000 in compensatory damages, and $50,000 in enhanced compensatory damages — plus front pay, attorney’s fees, and costs.

$480,000

Estate of Cheryl Sweeney v. Allard Nazarian Group, Inc.

Hillsborough County, New Hampshire · Superior Court · 02-C-843 · November 2005

Julie testified on a variety of employment practices, including the employer’s policies, FMLA leave, and ADA accommodation. At the conclusion of a ten-day trial, the jury returned a verdict to the plaintiff.

$2million

Cynthia Haddad v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Berkshire County, Massachusetts · Superior Court · 05-274 · June 2007

Believed to be the first case in Massachusetts involving testimony from an employment practices expert. Julie rendered opinions on Wal-Mart’s policies and practices and how they contributed to the gender discrimination that culminated in Cynthia Haddad’s termination. In 2009, the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the verdict in this precedent-setting case.